Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Van Gorp v Davy [2016] FCA 1385 File number: NSD 1358 of 2015
Judge: FARRELL J
Date of judgment: 22 November 2016
Catchwords: BANKRUPTCY – application for review of Registrar's decision – where Registrar dismissed application to set aside a bankruptcy notice – where bankruptcy notice attached costs assessment order made by Registrar in the Family Court of Australia – where bankruptcy notice did not attach the judgment to which the costs assessment order related – whether costs assessment order a "final judgment" or "final order" within the meaning of s 40(1)(g) of the Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) – Registrar's orders set aside – bankruptcy notice set aside BANKTUPCY – where applicant did not apply for a stay of the Registrar's order dismissing his application to set aside the bankruptcy notice or make an application to extend the time in which to comply with the bankruptcy notice – whether application for review otiose if act of bankruptcy committed COSTS – unrepresented litigant
Legislation: Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) ss 30, 40, 41, 306 Bankruptcy Regulations 1996 (Cth) reg 4.02, Sch 1 Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) ss 37A, 117 Family Law Rules 2004 (Cth) rr 19.30, 19.31, Ch 20 Federal Court (Bankruptcy) Rules 2016 (Cth) r 2.02, Sch 1 Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 35A Limitation Act 1969 (NSW) s 63
Cases cited: Adams v Lambert (2006) 228 CLR 409; [2006] HCA 10 Australian Super Pty Ltd v Woodward (2009) 262 ALR 402; [2009] FCAFC 168 Cachia v Hanes (1994) 179 CLR 403; [1994] HCA 14 Commonwealth Bank of Australia v Horvath (Junior) (1999) 161 ALR 441; [1999] FCA 143 Curtis v Singtel Optus Pty Ltd (2014) 225 FCR 458; [2014] FCAFC 144 Dekkan v Evans [2008] FCA 1004 Franks v Warringah Council (2003) 131 FCR 287; [2003] FCA 1047 Gibbs v Kinna [1999] 2 VR 19; [1998] VSCA 52 George v Fletcher (Trustee) (No 2) [2010] FCAFC 71 Guss v Johnstone (2000) 171 ALR 598; [2000] HCA 26 Harris v Caladine (1991) 172 CLR 84; [1991] HCA 9 Kleinwort Benson Australia Limited v Crowl (1988) 165 CLR 71; [1988] HCA 34 McMillan v McMillan [2016] FamCA 387 Re Glew; Glew v Harrowell of Hunt & Hunt Lawyers (2003) 198 ALR 331; [2003] FCA 373 Scott v Charitopoulos (2008) 174 FCR 9; [2008] FCA 1914 Stec v Orfanos [1999] FCA 457 Streimer v Tamas (1981) 37 ALR 211 Totev v Sfar (2008) 167 FCR 193; [2008] FCAFC 35 Winn v Blueprint Instant Printing Pty Ltd (2011) 193 FCR 41; [2011] FCA 293
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate