Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Orfali v Australian Information Commissioner [2016] FCA 1386 File number: VID 1195 of 2016
Judge: MORTIMER J
Date of judgment: 21 November 2016
Catchwords: HUMAN RIGHTS – privacy – complaints to the Australian Information Commissioner regarding alleged breaches of privacy by various entities – decision by delegate of the Commissioner not to investigate complaints on the ground they were lacking in substance – decision made pursuant to s 41(1)(d) of the Privacy Act 1988 (Cth) PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for an extension of time to file an application for judicial review under the Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1977 (Cth) – application for an extension of time refused
Legislation: Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1977 (Cth) ss 11(1)(c), 11(3) Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 43 Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) r 31.02 Privacy Act 1988 (Cth) ss 2A, 13, 36, 41(1)(d)
Cases cited: Assal v Dept of Health, Housing & Community Services [1990] HREOCA 8 Charara v Commissioner of Taxation [2016] FCA 451 Ebner v Official Trustee in Bankruptcy [2000] HCA 63; 205 CLR 337 Gao v Federal Privacy Commissioner [2001] FCA 1683 Hunter Valley Developments Pty Ltd v Cohen [1984] FCA 176; 3 FCR 344 Luck v Secretary, Department of Human Services [2014] FCA 1060 Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v Li [2013] HCA 18; 249 CLR 332
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate