Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
CCX15 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2016] FCA 1418 Appeal from: Application for extension of time: CCX15 v Minister for Immigration & Border Protection [2016] FCCA 1307
File number: NSD 996 of 2016
Judge: FARRELL J
Date of judgment: 24 November 2016
Catchwords: MIGRATION – application for extension of time to appeal judgment of the Federal Circuit Court of Australia – protection visas – where applicants failed to attend hearing of the application – application dismissed
Legislation: Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 25(2B)(bb)(ii)
Cases cited: CCX15 v Minister for Immigration & Border Protection [2016] FCCA 1307
Date of hearing: 24 November 2016
Registry: New South Wales
Division: General Division
National Practice Area: Administrative and Constitutional Law and Human Rights
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 6
Counsel for the Applicants: The applicants did not appear
Solicitor for the First Respondent: Ms B Griffin of Australian Government Solicitor
Counsel for the Second Respondent: The second respondent submitted save as to costs
ORDERS NSD 996 of 2016
BETWEEN: CCX15 First Applicant
CCY15 Second Applicant
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND BORDER PROTECTION First Respondent
ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS TRIBUNAL Second Respondent
JUDGE: FARRELL J DATE OF ORDER: 24 NOVEMBER 2016
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The application is dismissed pursuant to s 25(2B)(bb)(ii) of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) for failure of the applicants to appear at the hearing. 2. The applicants' pay the first respondent's costs as agreed or taxed. Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate