Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Le v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2016] FCA 1455 Appeal from: Le & Ors v Minister for Immigration & Anor [2016] FCCA 874
File number: NSD 649 of 2016
Judge: RARES J
Date of judgment: 17 August 2016
Catchwords: MIGRATION – visa applicant applied for employer nomination residence visa – Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth) – whether visa applicant fell within "exceptional circumstances" under subcl 856.213(c)(ii) – where "exceptional circumstances" not defined – where Tribunal applied tests of "so unique" and "essential" in considering whether "exceptional circumstances" – whether Tribunal committed jurisdictional error by departing from ordinary meaning of "exceptional circumstances" MIGRATION – where Tribunal found there was "no evidence" of the visa applicant's "exceptional circumstances" – where nominating employer provided a document in support of visa application that contained factual matters regarding the visa applicant's "exceptional circumstances" – whether Tribunal committed jurisdictional error by ignoring relevant material which would have affected the Tribunal's exercise of its power
Legislation: Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth) reg 1.15B, subcl 856.213(c) Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 140E, 140GB
Cases cited: Hatcher v Cohn (2004) 139 FCR 425 Minister for Aboriginal Affairs v Peko-Wallsend Limited (1986) 162 CLR 24 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v MZYTS (2013) 230 FCR 431 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v SZSRS (2014) 309 ALR 67 Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v SZJSS (2010) 243 CLR 164 Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v SZRKT (2013) 212 FCR 99 Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Wu Shan Liang (1996) 185 CLR 259
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate