Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Ellis v Secretary, Department of Social Services [2016] FCA 1469 Appeal from: Troy Ellis and Secretary, Department of Social Services [2016] AATA 490
File number: WAD 345 of 2016
Judge: BARKER J
Date of judgment: 30 November 2016
Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – appeal from Administrative Appeals Tribunal (Tribunal) under s 44 of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (Cth) – where Tribunal affirmed decision to cancel mobility allowance – whether grounds of appeal stated question or questions of law – whether Tribunal failed to take into account relevant consideration – whether Tribunal demonstrated bias
Legislation: Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) R 33.12(2) Social Security Act 1991 (Cth) ss 19, 1035(1), 1035(1)(a)(ii), 1035(1)(b)(ii), 1035(1)(f)(ii), 1035(1)(g)(iii), 1035(1)(h), 1035(2) Social Security (Administration) Act 1999 (Cth)
Cases cited: Avetmiss Easy Pty Ltd v Australian Skills Qualifications Authority [2014] FCA 314 Haritos v Commissioner of Taxation (2015) 233 FCR 315; [2015] FCAFC 92
Date of hearing: 30 November 2016
Registry: Western Australia
Division: General Division
National Practice Area: Administrative and Constitutional Law and Human Rights
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 13
Counsel for the Applicant: The Applicant did not appear
Counsel for the Respondent: Mr A Burgess
Solicitor for the Respondent: Sparke Helmore Lawyers
ORDERS WAD 345 of 2016
BETWEEN: TROY ELLIS Applicant
AND: SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES Respondent
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate