Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Woolworths Limited [2016] FCA 1472 File number: NSD 1625 of 2015
Judge: YATES J
Date of judgment: 8 December 2016
Catchwords: CONSUMER LAW – unconscionable conduct in trade or commerce – whether the design and implementation of a scheme that was targeted to reducing a projected profit shortfall was unconscionable
Legislation: Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth) Sch 2, ss 21, 22
Cases cited: Attorney General of New South Wales v World Best Holdings Ltd (2005) 63 NSWLR 557; [2005] NSWCA 261 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Coles Supermarkets Australia Pty Ltd [2014] FCA 1405 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Lux Distributors Pty Ltd [2013] ATPR 42-447; [2013] FCAFC 90 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v South East Melbourne Cleaning Pty Ltd (in liq) (formerly known as Coverall Cleaning Concepts South East Melbourne Pty Ltd) [2015] FCA 25 Australian Securities and Investments Commission v National Exchange Pty Ltd (2005) 148 FCR 132; [2005] FCAFC 226 Canon Australia Pty Ltd v Patton (2007) 244 ALR 759; [2007] NSWCA 246 Director of Consumer Affairs Victoria v Scully (2013) 303 ALR 168; [2013] VSCA 292 Paciocco v Australia & New Zealand Banking Group Ltd (2016) 90 ALJR 835; [2016] HCA 28 Paciocco v Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Ltd (2015) 236 FCR 199; [2015] FCAFC 50 PT Ltd v Spuds Surf Chatswood Pty Ltd [2013] NSWCA 446
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate