Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Hochtief Aktiengesellschaft [2016] FCA 1489 File number(s): NSD 160 of 2016
Judge(s): WIGNEY J
Date of judgment: 8 December 2016
Catchwords: CORPORATIONS – insider trading prohibition – where a corporation procured another corporation to acquire shares while in possession of inside information – elements of the insider trading prohibition – declaration of contravention – pecuniary penalty order – principles to be applied in determined an appropriate penalty
Legislation: Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), Sch 3, ss 1042A, 1042D, 1043A(1)(d), 1311(1), 1317G(1A), 1317G(1A)(c)(iii) Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth), s 21 Evidence Act 1995 (Cth), s 191
Cases cited: Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v AGL South Australia Limited (2015) 146 ALD 385 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Apple Pty Limited [2012] FCA 646 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Coles Supermarkets Australia Pty Ltd [2015] FCA 330 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union [2006] FCA 1730 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Leahy Petroleum Pty Ltd (No 3) [2005] FCA 265 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v MSY Technology Pty Ltd No 2 [2011] FCA 382 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v TPG Internet Pty Ltd (2013) 250 CLR 640 Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Adler (No 5) [2002] NSWSC 483 Australian Securities and Investments Commission v GE Capital Finance Australia [2014] FCA 701 Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Petsas [2005] FCA 88 Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Southcorp Ltd (2003) 130 FCR 406 Australian Securities and Investments Commission, in the matter of Chemeq Limited (ACN 009 135 264) v Chemeq Limited (ACN 009 135 264) [2006] FCA 936 Barbaro v R (2014) 253 CLR 58 Commonwealth v Director, Fair Work Building Industry Inspectorate [2015] HCA 46 Forster v Jododex Australia Pty Limited (1972) 127 CLR 421 Fysh v R [2013] NSWCCA 284 Hannes v Director of Public Prosecutions (Cth) (No 2) [2006] NSWCCA 373 Markarian v The Queen (2005) 228 CLR 357 Minister for Environment, Heritage and the Arts v PGP Developments Pty Ltd (2010) 183 FCR 10 NW Frozen Foods Pty Ltd v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (1996) 71 FCR 285 R v Doff [2005] NSWCCA 119 R v Farris [2015] WASC 251 R v Firns (2001) 51 NSWLR 548 R v Fysh (No 4) [2012] NSWSC 1587 R v Hannes [2000] NSWCCA 503 R v Rivkin [2003] NSWSC 447 R v Rivkin [2004] NSWCCA 7 R v Zhu [2013] NSWSC 127 Re Idylic Solutions Pty Ltd; Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Hobbs [2013] NSWSC 106 Rivkin Financial Services Ltd v Sofcom Ltd [2004] FCA 1538 Singtel Optus Pty Ltd v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission [2012] FCAFC 20 Tobacco Institute of Australia Limited v Australian Federation of Consumer Organisations Inc (No 2) (1993) 41 FCR 89 TPG Internet Pty Ltd v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (2012) 210 FCR 277 Trade Practices Commission v CSR Ltd [1990] FCA 521 Trade Practices Commission v Stihl Chain Saws (Aust) Pty Ltd (1978) ATPR 40-091 Yorke v Lucas (1985) 158 CLR 661
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate