Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Kingspan v Amalgamated Metal Industries Pty Ltd trading as Ametalin [2016] FCA 1490 File number(s): WAD 76 of 2016
Judge(s): GILMOUR J
Date of judgment: 9 December 2016
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for further and better discovery – where the relevant documents have previously been discovered
Legislation: Federal Court Rules 2011 rr 20.11, 20.14, 20.14(1), 20.14(1)(a), 20.14(3)
Cases cited: Compagnie Financiere et Commerciale du Pacifique v The Peruvian Guano Company (1882) 11 QBD 55 Metcash Trading Limited v Bunn [2010] FCA 8 Salim v Loh (No 2) [2005] FCA 1417 Taylor v Saloniklis (No 3) [2014] FCA 744 United Salvage Pty Ltd v Louis Dreyfus Amateurs SNC [2006] FCA 116 Westpac Banking Corporation v Hingston [2010] FCA 528
Date of hearing: 20 September 2016
Registry: Western Australia
Division: General Division
National Practice Area: Commercial and Corporations
Sub-area: Regulator and Consumer Protection
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 34
Counsel for the Applicant: Mr K de Kerloy
Solicitor for the Applicant: Herbert Smith Freehills
Counsel for the Respondents: Mr BC Roberts SC
Solicitor for the Respondents: Cowell Clarke
ORDERS WAD 76 of 2016
BETWEEN: KINGSPAN INSULATION PTY LTD (ACN 100 405 025) Applicant
AND: AMALGAMATED METAL INDUSTRIES PTY LTD T/A AMETALIN (ACN 087 945 720) First Respondent MICHEL BOSTROM Second Respondent REFLEX INSULATION PTY LTD (ACN 136 829 840) Third Respondent NATHAN MARK MANSFIELD Fourth Respondent
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate