Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Oswal v Commissioner of Taxation (Rambal Subpoena) [2016] FCA 1507 File numbers: NSD 850 of 2012 NSD 851 of 2012 NSD 852 of 2012
Judge: PAGONE J
Date of judgment: 13 December 2016
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Subpoena – subpoenaed party's costs, reasonable losses and expenses PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Application for freezing order – whether application was improperly made – whether applicant's legal representatives should pay costs
Legislation: Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) Taxation Administration Act 1953 (Cth) Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth)
Cases cited: A Pty Ltd v Z [2007] NSWSC 999 Ann Street Mezzanine Pty Ltd v Beck [2011] FCA 1328 Ann Street Mezzanine Pty Ltd v Beck [2013] FCA 960 Ann Street Mezzanine Pty Ltd v KPMG [2011] FCA 453 Australian Securities Commission v Aust-Home Investments Limited (1993) 44 FCR 194 Bank of New South Wales v Withers (1981) 35 ALR 21 Chapman v Luminis Pty Ltd [2003] FCAFC 162 Charlick Trading Pty Ltd v Australian National Railways Commission (1997) 149 ALR 647 Curtis v NID Pty Limited [2010] FCA 1072 Danieletto v Khera (1995) 35 NSWLR 684 Fuelxpress Ltd v L M Ericsson Pty Ltd (1987) 75 ALR 284 Hadid v Lenfest Communications Inc (1996) 65 FCR 350 Hua Wang Bank Berhad v Commissioner of Taxation (No 12) [2013] FCA 1091 J Aron Corporation Pty Ltd v Newmont Yandal Operations Pty Ltd (2005) NSWSC 1280 Mowie Fisheries Pty Ltd v Switzerland Insurance Australia Ltd [1996] FCA 608 ONE.TEL Limited v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation [2000] FCA 270 Oswal v Commissioner of Taxation (No 4) [2016] FCA 666 Re Minister for Immigration & Ethnic Affairs; Ex parte Lai Qin (1997) 186 CLR 622 Smith v Wyong Shire Council [2007] NSWLEC 395 Young v Lalic [2006] NSWSC 379
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate