Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Activistic Limited, in the matter of Activistic Limited [2016] FCA 1520 File number: WAD 562 of 2016
Judge: BARKER J
Date of judgment: 9 December 2016
Catchwords: CORPORATIONS – application for extending time for compliance with s 625(3)(c)(i) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) pursuant to s 1322(4)(d) and s 1325A of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) – where extension sought only one day – whether prejudice may be caused to any party
Legislation: Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) ss 1322(4)(d), 1324A, 1325A(2)(i)
Cases cited: Dourado Resources Limited v Aurium Resources Limited [2010] FCA 1208 FE Limited v Padbury Mining [2010] FCA 1207 Re Grain Corp Limited [2008] FCA 996 Re McMahon Holdings Limited [2008] FCA 1079 Re Venturex Resources Limited (2009) 177 FCR 391; [2009] FCA 677
Date of hearing: 9 December 2016
Registry: Western Australia
Division: General Division
National Practice Area: Commercial and Corporations
Sub-area: Corporations and Corporate Insolvency
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 18
Counsel for the Plaintiff: Mr JM Healy
Solicitor for the Plaintiff: Steinepreis Paganin
ORDERS WAD 562 of 2016 IN THE MATTER OF ACTIVISTIC LIMITED ACN 007 701 715 ACTIVISTIC LIMITED ACN 007 701 715 Plaintiff
JUDGE: BARKER J DATE OF ORDER: 9 DECEMBER 2016
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate