Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Kaboko Mining Limited v Van Heerden [2016] FCA 1532 File number: WAD 403 of 2016
Judge: MCKERRACHER J
Date of judgment: 15 December 2016
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – interlocutory application to set aside subpoena – where subpoena complied with – whether documents produced in response to the subpoena have apparent relevance
Legislation: Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) rr 24.15(1), 24.20(3)
Cases cited: Adelaide Steamship Co v Spalvins (1997) 24 ACSR 536 Anderson Formrite Pty Ltd v Hornibrook Pty Ltd (No 3) [2009] FCA 273 Apache Northwest Pty Ltd v Western Power Corporation (1998) 19 WAR 350 City of Sydney v Streetscape Projects (Australia) Pty Ltd [2011] NSWSC 364 Gloucester Shire Council v Fitch Ratings Inc [2016] FCA 587 Horizontal Falls Adventure Tours Pty Ltd v Thomas [2009] FCA 639 Mandic v Phillis (2005) 225 ALR 760 National Employers' Mutual General Insurance Association Ltd v Waind [1978] 1 NSWLR 372 Southern Pacific Hotel Services Inc v Southern Pacific Hotel Corporation Ltd [1984] 1 NSWLR 710
Date of hearing: 27 October 2016
Registry: Western Australia
Division: General Division
National Practice Area: Commercial and Corporations
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate