Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Tu v Chang (No 2) [2016] FCA 1568 File number: NSD 927 of 2016
Judge: BROMWICH J
Date of judgment: 22 December 2016
Catchwords: BANKRUPTCY AND INSOLVENCY – application to set aside bankruptcy notice – "counter-claim, set-off or cross demand" pursuant to ss 40(1)(g) and 41(7) of the Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) – supplementary ground raised that the judgment upon which the bankruptcy notice was issued was invalid due to inclusion of filing fee so as to render bankruptcy notice invalid – held: bankruptcy notice was valid pursuant to s 306(1) of the Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) – held: "counter-claim, set-off or cross demand" established – held: application to set aside bankruptcy notice allowed with costs
Legislation: Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth), ss 40(1)(g), 41(5), 41(6), 41(6A), 41(7), 306, 306(1) Bankruptcy Regulations 1996 (Cth), reg 4.02, Sch 1 Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW), s 133 Civil Procedure Regulations 2012 (NSW), cl 7(1), Sch 1 Legal Profession Act 1987 (NSW), ss 208J(3), 208JA(4) Legal Profession Act 2004 (NSW), ss 368, 368(5), 369, 369(7) Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), rr 36.10, 36.11
Cases cited: Adams v Lambert [2006] HCA 10; (2006) 228 CLR 409 Coshott v Barry [2015] NSWCA 257; (2015) 91 NSWLR 1 Croker v Commissioner of Taxation [2005] FCA 127; (2005) 145 FCR 150 Cumins v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation [2008] FCAFC 185; (2008) 172 FCR 425 Dennis v Miller [2012] FMCA 25; (2012) 257 FLR 64 Ebert v The Union Trustee Company of Australia Limited [1960] HCA 50; (1960) 104 CLR 346 Gomez v State Bank of New South Wales Limited [2002] FCAFC 101 sub nom Gomez v State Bank of New South Wales Limited [2002] FCA 442 Harman v Secretary of State for the Home Department [1983] 1 AC 280 Hearne v Street [2008] HCA 36; (2008) 235 CLR 125 Hussain v King Investment Solutions Pty Ltd [2006] FCA 905; (2006) 153 FCR 428 Lord & Anor v Rankine & Ors [2010] FMCA 668 Nugawela v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation [2016] FCAFC 164 Project Blue Sky Inc v Australian Broadcasting Authority [1998] HCA 28; (1998) 194 CLR 355 Rankine v Lord [2011] FCA 478; (2011) 121 ALD 258 Re Brink; Ex parte The Commercial Banking Company of Sydney Ltd [1980] FCA 78; (1980) 30 ALR 433 Re Judd; Ex parte Pike (1924) 24 SR (NSW) 537 Re Walsh (1982) 65 FLR 87 Seovic Civil Engineering Pty Ltd v Groeneveld [1999] FCA 255; (1999) 87 FCR 120 Stec v Orfanos [1999] FCA 457 The Australian Steel Company (Operations) Pty Ltd v Lewis [2000] FCA 1915; (2000) 109 FCR 33 Wende v Howarth (No 2) [2015] NSWCA 416; (2015) 91 NSWLR 588 Murray M and Harris J, Keay's Insolvency: Personal and Corporate Law and Practice (9th ed, Lawbook Co., 2016)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate