Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BRK15 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2016] FCA 1570 File number: WAD 150 of 2016
Judge: GILMOUR J
Date of judgment: 22 December 2016
Catchwords: MIGRATION – Refugee – Unlawful non-citizen – Refusal to grant a protection (class XA) visa – applicant owed non-refoulement obligation by Australia – Indefinite immigration detention – No realistic prospect of removal from Australia in reasonably foreseeable future – Whether the Minister's exercise of power under s 501(1) of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) was affected by jurisdictional error ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – Judicial review – procedural fairness – Requirement to inform applicant of the critical importance of his employability as affected by his disability being relevant to consideration of his application - The decision maker must also advise of any adverse conclusion which would not obviously be open on the known material
Legislation: Disability Discrimination Act 1992 (Cth) ss 15, 15(1)(b), 21A, 21B Federal Circuit Court of Australia Act 1999 (Cth) s 39 Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 169, 196, 476A(1)(c), 501, 501(1), 501(6)(a), 501(7)(c)
Cases cited: Minister for Aboriginal Affairs v Peko-Wallsend Ltd (1986) 162 CLR 24 Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v SZGUR (2011) 241 CLR 594 Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs; Ex-parte Lam (2003) 214 CLR 1 Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs v Watson (205) 145 FCR 542 NBMZ v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (2014) 220 FCR 1 NBNB v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (2014) 220 FCR 44 Roach v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2016] FCA 750
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate