Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Royal v El Ali (No 3) [2016] FCA 1573 File numbers: NSD 1731 of 2013 NSD 771 of 2014
Judge: DAVIES J
Date of judgment: 22 December 2016
Catchwords: COSTS – application for costs fixed in lump-sum – whether appropriate and practicable to make lump-sum costs order – whether apportionment methodology as between the two proceedings was fair and reasonable – whether there can be a reduction in the amount of inter-partes costs for failure to comply with requirements of the Legal Profession Act 2004 (NSW) – application of indemnity principle – whether there are costs to be indemnified – whether a joint and several costs order should not be made
Legislation: Federal Court (Bankruptcy) Rules 2016 (Cth), r 13.01 Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth), s 43(3)(d) Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth), r 40.02(b) Legal Profession Act 2004 (NSW), ss 309, 310, 317, 323, 324, 327
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate