Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Secretary, Department of Employment v Simpson [2017] FCA 9 Appeal from: Simpson v Secretary, Department of Employment [2016] AATA 526
File number: VID 999 of 2016
Judge: JESSUP J
Date of judgment: 19 January 2017
Catchwords: INDUSTRIAL LAW – where employee's employment terminated after sale of business and subsequently hired by new employer – whether entitlement to long service leave under statute – whether Tribunal erred in holding entitlement owed by both employers – identification of correct employer at issue – appeal upheld.
Legislation: Fair Entitlements Guarantee Act 2012 (Cth) ss 3, 6, 10, 15 Long Service Leave Act 1992 (Vic) ss 60, 66, 72, 74
Cases cited: Melbourne Cricket Club v Clohesy (2005) 14 VR 206
Date of hearing: 6 December 2016
Registry: Victoria
Division: General Division
National Practice Area: Employment & Industrial Relations
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 24
Counsel for the Applicant: Mr J Bourke QC with Mr M Follett
Solicitor for the Applicant: HWL Ebsworth
Counsel for the Respondent: The respondent did not appear
ORDERS VID 999 of 2016
BETWEEN: SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF EMPLOYMENT Applicant
AND: KATHLEEN SIMPSON Respondent
JUDGE: JESSUP J DATE OF ORDER: 19 JANUARY 2017
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. Paragraph 2 of the Decision of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal made on 25 July 2015 be set aside. 2. The case be remitted to the Tribunal with a direction to affirm, in such terms as the Tribunal considers reflect the reasons of the Court published this day, the decision of the delegate of the applicant under s 15(1) of the Fair Entitlements Guarantee Act 2012 (Cth) that the respondent was not eligible for an advance in respect of long service leave. 3. There be no order as to costs. Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate