Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
CDC15 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2017] FCA 18 Appeal from: CDC15 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2016] FCCA 1314
File number: SAD 165 of 2016
Judge: CHARLESWORTH J
Date of judgment: 25 January 2017
Catchwords: MIGRATION – protection visa – whether Tribunal failed to consider and determine an "essential integer" of claim – whether failure to exercise review jurisdiction – requirement to consider claim raised on material before Tribunal
Legislation: Migration Act 1958 (Cth), ss 5, 36, 36(2A), 65, 474, 476
Cases cited: Applicant WAEE v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs (2003) 75 ALD 630 Chan v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs (1989) 169 CLR 379 Collector of Customs v Pozzolanic Enterprises Pty Ltd (1993) 43 FCR 280 Craig v South Australia (1995) 184 CLR 163 Htun v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (2001) 233 FCR 136 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v MZYTS (2013) 230 FCR 431 Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v Li (2013) 249 CLR 332 Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v SZIAI [2009] HCA 39, (2009) 259 ALR 429 Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Wu Shan Liang (1996) 185 CLR 259 Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Yusuf (2001) 206 CLR 323 NABE v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs (No 2) (2004) 144 FCR 1 Plaintiff S157/2002 v Commonwealth of Australia (2003) 211 CLR 476 Re Refugee Review Tribunal; Ex parte Aala (2000) 204 CLR 82 S395/2002 v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (2003) 216 CLR 473
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate