Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
SZTZH v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2017] FCA 55 Appeal from: SZTZH v Minister for Immigration & Anor [2016] FCCA 1139
File number: NSD 856 of 2016
Judge: BROMBERG J
Date of judgment: 2 February 2017
Catchwords: MIGRATION – Protection (Class XA) visa – appeal from the Federal Circuit Court of Australia ("FCC") – whether FCC erred in failing to discern jurisdictional error in Tribunal's decision – where the visa applicant, through his migration agent, made to the delegate a claim to be owed protection obligations on the basis of being a member of a particular social group – where the claim was not repeated before the Tribunal – whether the Tribunal constructively failed to exercise its jurisdiction by not engaging with the claim in a real or active way – Tribunal's reasons indicate that it considered the claim not pressed and did not deal with the claim on its merits – where it was conceded that the Tribunal had a duty to consider the claim – Tribunal constructively failed to exercise its jurisdiction under s 414 of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) – the FCC erred in failing to discern Tribunal's error – appeal allowed
Legislation: Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 36, 411, 414, 474
Cases cited: Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v MZYTS (2013) 230 FCR 431 MZZKA v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2014] FCA 633 NABE v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs (No 2) (2004) 144 FCR 1 Plaintiff S157/2002 v Commonwealth (2003) 211 CLR 476 Re Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs; Ex parte Applicant S20/2002 [2003] HCA 30; 198 ALR 59 SLMB v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2004] FCAFC 129 SZTZH v Minister for Immigration & Anor [2016] FCCA 1139
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate