Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Shizas v Commissioner of Police [2017] FCA 61 File number: NSD 721 of 2015
Judge: KATZMANN J
Date of judgment: 6 February 2017
Catchwords: INDUSTRIAL LAW — General protections —adverse action by employer against prospective employee — claim of discrimination because of physical disability under s 351(1) of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) — whether prohibition applies to a prospective employer — whether prospective employee refused employment because of physical disability — meaning of "physical disability" — whether prospective employee refused employment because of inherent requirements of "particular position concerned" — characterisation of particular position concerned — identification of inherent requirements INDUSTRIAL LAW — General protections — remedies — appropriate relief under s 545(1) of the Fair Work Act
Words & phrases: "disability"
Legislation: Australian Federal Police Act 1979 (Cth), ss 8, 9, 23, 24, 40B, 69C Australian Human Rights Commission Act 1986 (Cth) Pt IIB Disability Discrimination Act 1992 (Cth), s 21A Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth), ss 335, 342(1) item 2, 351, 360, 361, 545 Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth), s 21 Explanatory Memorandum, Fair Work Bill 2008 (Cth)
Cases cited: Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union [2006] FCA 1730; [2007] ATPR ¶42-140 Board of Bendigo Regional Institute of Technical and Further Education v Barclay (2012) 249 CLR 500 Commissioner of Police for New South Wales v Eaton (2013) 252 CLR 1 Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union v BHP Coal Pty Ltd (2014) 253 CLR 243 Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union v Clermont Coal Pty Ltd [2015] FCA 1014; 253 IR 166 Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union v Endeavour Coal Pty Ltd (2015) 231 FCR 150 Director of Fair Work Building Industry Inspectorate v Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union (No 2) [2016] FCA 436 Elliott v Kodak Australasia Pty Ltd [2001] FCA 1804; 129 IR 251 General Motors Holden Pty Ltd v Bowling (1976) 12 ALR 605 Gibbs v Palmerston Town Council [1987] FCA 732 Khiani v Australian Bureau of Statistics [2011] FCAFC 109 Purvis v New South Wales (2003) 217 CLR 92 Qantas Airways Ltd v Christie (1998) 193 CLR 280 RailPro Services Pty Ltd v Flavel (2015) 242 FCR 424 Rural Press Ltd v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (2003) 216 CLR 53 Short v Ambulance Victoria [2015] FCAFC 55; 249 IR 217 National Tertiary Education Union v Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology [2013] FCA 451; 234 IR 139 Tattsbet Limited v Morrow (2015) 233 FCR 46 Vickers v The Ambulance Service of NSW [2006] FMCA 1232 Victoria (Office of Public Prosecutions) v Grant [2014] FCAFC 184; 246 IR 441 Voigtsberger v Pine Rivers Shire Council (1981) 1 IR 198 X v Commonwealth (1999) 200 CLR 177 Macquarie Dictionary (4th ed, Macquarie Library, 2005) Shorter Oxford English Dictionary (6th ed, Oxford University Press, 2007)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate