Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Kulas v Prosegur Australia Pty Ltd [2017] FCA 85 Appeal from: Kulas and Prosegur Australia Pty Ltd (Compensation) [2016] AATA 538
File number: VID 1015 of 2016
Judge: PAGONE J
Date of judgment: 10 February 2017
Catchwords: INDUSTRIAL LAW – Safety Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 1988 (Cth) – appeal from decision of Administrative Appeals Tribunal – rehabilitation program – refusal or failure to undertake rehabilitation program – whether reasonable excuse – whether Tribunal erroneously received certain evidence
Legislation: Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (Cth) Safety Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 1988 (Cth)
Cases cited: AON Risk Services Australia Ltd v Australian National University (2009) 239 CLR 175 Brown v Repatriation Commission (1985) 7 FCR 302 Haritos v Commissioner of Taxation (2015) 233 FCR 315 Kowalski v Chief Executive Officer Medicare Australia (2010) 185 FCR 42 TNT Skypak International (Aust) Pty Ltd v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1988) 82 ALR 175
Date of hearing: 13 December 2016
Registry: Victoria
Division: General Division
National Practice Area: Employment & Industrial Relations
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 23
Counsel for the Applicant: The applicant appeared in person
Counsel for the Respondent: Mr C Jones
Solicitor for the Respondent: Moray & Agnew
ORDERS VID 1015 of 2016
BETWEEN: KRASANDAR KULAS Applicant
AND: PROSEGUR AUSTRALIA PTY LTD Respondent
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate