Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Chugh v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2017] FCA 99 Appeal from: Chugh v Minister for Immigration & Anor [2016] FCCA 2006
File number: VID 877 of 2016
Judge: MOSHINSKY J
Date of judgment: 15 February 2017
Legislation: Migration Act 1958 (Cth), s 499(2A) Federal Court Rules 2011, rr 36.01, 36.02, 36.03 Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth), Sch 2, cl 572.223(1)(a)
Date of hearing: 18 November 2016
Registry: Victoria
Division: General Division
National Practice Area: Administrative and Constitutional Law and Human Rights
Category: No Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 10
Counsel for the Appellant: The appellant appeared in person with the assistance of an interpreter
Solicitor for the First Respondent: Mr V Murano, Clayton Utz
Counsel for the Second Respondent: The second respondent filed a submitting notice, save as to costs
ORDERS VID 877 of 2016
BETWEEN: RAJAT CHUGH Appellant
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND BORDER PROTECTION First Respondent
ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS TRIBUNAL Second Respondent
JUDGE: MOSHINSKY J DATE OF ORDER: 15 FEBRUARY 2017
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The application for an extension of time and leave to appeal be treated as if it were a notice of appeal filed in accordance with rules 36.01, 36.02 and 36.03 of the Federal Court Rules 2011. 2. The draft notice of appeal filed by the appellant on 1 August 2016 stand as the notice of appeal. 3. The appeal be dismissed. 4. By 4.00 pm on 17 February 2017, each party file any further submission (no more than one page) on costs. Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate