Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
CKT15 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2017] FCA 100 Appeal from: CKT15 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2016] FCCA 3005
File number: NSD 1964 of 2016
Judge: FARRELL J
Date of judgment: 14 February 2017
Catchwords: MIGRATION – appeal from decision of the Federal Circuit Court of Australia – protection visa – where appellant did not attend interview with Minister's delegate – where appellant did not attend Tribunal hearing – where appellant failed to appear at hearing of the appeal – appeal dismissed
Legislation: Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) r 36.75(1)(a)
Cases cited: CKT15 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2016] FCCA 3005
Date of hearing: 14 February 2017
Registry: New South Wales
Division: General Division
National Practice Area: Administrative and Constitutional Law and Human Rights
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 6
Counsel for the Appellant: The appellant did not appear
Counsel for the First Respondent: Mr T Reilly
Solicitor for the First Respondent: Mills Oakley
Counsel for the Second Respondent: The second respondent submitted save as to costs
ORDERS NSD 1964 of 2016
BETWEEN: CKT15 Appellant
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND BORDER PROTECTION First Respondent
ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS TRIBUNAL Second Respondent
JUDGE: FARRELL J DATE OF ORDER: 14 FEBRUARY 2017
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The appeal is dismissed pursuant to r 36.75(1)(a) of the Federal Court Rules 2011 for failure of the appellant to appear when the appeal was called on for hearing. 2. The appellant pay the first respondent's costs as agreed or taxed. Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate