Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Uber B.V. v Commissioner of Taxation [2017] FCA 110 File number: NSD 904 of 2015
Judge: GRIFFITHS J
Date of judgment: 17 February 2017
Catchwords: TAXATION – whether a person supplying uberX services is required to be registered under Division 144 of the A New Tax System (Goods and Services Tax) Act 1999 (Cth) (the GST Act) – whether carrying on the enterprise of providing uberX services to passengers constitutes supply "taxi travel" within the meaning of s 144-5(1) (as defined in s 195-1) of the GST Act. STATUTORY INTERPRETATION – whether the terms "taxi" and "limousine" in the definition of "taxi travel" in s 195-1 of the GST Act should be given an ordinary meaning or a trade meaning – whether the definition of "taxi travel" in s 195-1 of the GST Act should be construed as a composite phrase. Held: application dismissed with costs.
Legislation: A New Tax System (Goods and Services Tax) Act 1999 (Cth) ss 9-5, 9-10 23-5, 144-5, 195-1
Cases cited: Alcan (NT) Alumina Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Territory Revenue [2009] HCA 41; 239 CLR 27 Australian Gas Light Co v Valuer-General (1940) 40 SR (NSW) 126 Certain Lloyd's Underwriters v Cross [2012] HCA 56; 248 CLR 378 Chaudhri v Commissioner of Taxation [2001] FCA 554; 109 FCR 416 Chubb Insurance Co of Australia Ltd v Moore [2013] NSWCA 212 CIC Insurance Ltd v Bankstown Football Club Ltd [1997] HCA 2; 187 CLR 384 Collector of Customs v Agfa-Gevaert Ltd [1996] HCA 36; 186 CLR 389 Commissioner of Taxation of the Commonwealth of Australia v ICI Australia Limited [1972] HCA 75; 127 CLR 529 The Council of the Shire of Lake Macquarie v Aberdare County Council [1970] HCA 32; 123 CLR 327 Dreamtech International Pty Ltd v Federal Commissioner of Taxation [2010] FCAFC 103; 187 FCR 352 Herbert Adams Pty Ltd v Federal Commissioner of Taxation [1932] HCA 27; 47 CLR 222 Hope v Bathurst City Council [1980] HCA 16; 144 CLR 1 Hore v Albury Radio Taxis Co-Op Society Ltd [2002] NSWSC 1130; 56 NSWLR 210 Independent Commission Against Corruption v Cunneen [2015] HCA 14; 256 CLR 1 Lansell House Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation [2010] FCA 329; ATC 20-173 Lansell House Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation [2011] FCAFC 6; 190 FCR 354 NSW Associated Blue-Metal Quarries Ltd v Federal Commissioner of Taxation [1956] HCA 80; 94 CLR 509 Pepsi Seven-Up Bottlers Perth Pty Limited v Commissioner of Taxation [1995] FCA 1655; 62 FCR 289 Project Blue Sky Inc v Australian Broadcasting Authority [1998] HCA 28; 194 CLR 355 Provincial Insurance Australia Pty Ltd v Consolidated Wood Products Pty Ltd (1991) 25 NSWLR 541 Quikfund (Australia) Pty Ltd v Airmark Consolidators Pty Ltd (2014) 222 FCR 13 R v Brown [1996] AC 543 Residual Assco Group v Spalvins [2000] HCA 33; 202 CLR 629 Saga Holidays Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation [2005] FCA 1892; 149 FCR 41 Saga Holidays Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation [2006] FCAFC 191; 156 FCR 256 Sea Shepherd Australia Ltd v Federal Commissioner of Taxation [2013] FCAFC 68; 212 FCR 252 Telstra Corporation Limited v Commissioner of Taxation (1996) 68 FCR 566 Thiess v Collector of Customs [2014] HCA 12; 250 CLR 664 Transport for London v Uber London Ltd [2015] EWHC 2918 Wilson v Commissioner of Stamp Duties (1988) 13 NSWLR 77
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate