Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Romero v Farstad Shipping (Indian Pacific) Pty Ltd (No 4) [2017] FCA 120 File number: TAD 72 of 2012
Judge: TRACEY J
Date of judgment: 20 February 2017
Catchwords: COSTS – applicant awarded nominal damages for breach of contract – settlement offers made by respondent in 2013 and 2014 – subsequent to both offers, claims including a claim part of subject proceeding settled by deed – consideration of whether applicant "successful", in light of award of nominal damages – whether settlement offers effective to enliven Pt 25 of the Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) or principles in Calderbank v Calderbank [1975] 3 All ER 333 – applicant not "successful" – offers not effective, in light of later execution of deed – award of costs on party/party basis from date of application of deed
Legislation: Disability Discrimination Act 1992 (Cth) Evidence Act 1995 (Cth), s 131(1), 131(2)(h) Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth), s 43 Seafarers Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 1992 (Cth), ss 3, 54(1), 58 Sex Discrimination Act 1984 (Cth) Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth), rr 25.01(1), 25.14(1), 25.14(2), 25.14(3), 26.12(7)
Cases cited: Alexander v Australian Community Pharmacy Authority (No 2) [2010] FCA 467 Anchorage Capital Partners Pty Limited v ACPA Pty Limited (No 4) [2016] FCA 218 Anglo-Cyprian Trade Agencies Ltd v Paphos Wine Industries Ltd [1951] 1 All ER 873 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Australian Safeway Stores Pty Limited (No 3) [2002] FCA 1294 Beaumont v Greathead (1846) 135 ER 1039 at 1041; 2 CB 494 Calderbank v Calderbank [1975] 3 All ER 333 Colin R Price & Associates Pty Ltd v Four Oaks Pty Ltd (No 3) [2016] FCA 1031 Commonwealth of Australia v Gretton [2008] NSWCA 117 Computer Machinery Co Ltd v Drescher [1983] 1 WLR 1379 Gorst v Sydney Equine Coaches Pty Ltd [2016] FCA 1067 IFTC Broking Services Limited v Commissioner of Taxation [2010] FCAFC 31; 268 ALR 1 Marks v GIO Australia Holdings Ltd (No 2) (1996) 66 FCR 128 Motium Pty Ltd v Arrow Electronics Australia Pty Ltd (Supplementary Decision) [2011] WASCA 65 Nexus Minerals NL v Brutus Constructions Pty Ltd [1997] FCA 926 Pinot Nominees Pty Ltd v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (2009) 181 FCR 392 Rakic v Johns Lyng Insurance Building Solutions (Victoria) Pty Ltd (Trustee) (No 2) [2016] FCA 783 Romero v Farstad Shipping (Indian Pacific) Pty Ltd (2014) 231 FCR 403 Romero v Farstad Shipping (Indian Pacific) Pty Ltd (No 2) [2014] FCA 526 Romero v Farstad Shipping (Indian Pacific) Pty Ltd (No 2) [2015] FCAFC 26 Romero v Farstad Shipping (Indian Pacific) Pty Ltd (No 3) [2016] FCA 1453 Romero v Farstad Shipping (Indian Pacific) Pty Ltd [2014] FCA 439 Ruddock v Vardalis (No 2) (2001) 115 FCR 229 Skyy Spirits LLC v Lodestar Anstalt (No 2) [2015] FCA 575 State of New South Wales v Stevens (2012) 82 NSWLR 106 Tickell v Trifleska Pty Ltd (1990) 25 NSWLR 353 Veda Advantage Limited v Malouf Group Enterprises Pty Limited (No 2) [2016] FCA 470
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate