Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Kumar v Secretary, Department of Social Services [2017] FCA 158 Appeal from: Kumar v Secretary, Department of Social Services [2016] FCCA 640
File number: QUD 241 of 2016
Judge: REEVES J
Date of judgment: 24 February 2017
Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – eligibility for disability support pension – appellant suffered multiple work-related injuries leading him to cease employment – appeal from a decision of the Federal Circuit Court of Australia on questions of law – construction of s 94 of the Social Security Act 1991 (Cth) – where certain appeal grounds were not raised before the Federal Circuit Court – whether the primary judge erred in the construction of "continuing inability to work" as defined in s 94(2) of the Act – whether the primary judge erred in the construction of "program of support" (s 94(5) of the Act) – whether the appellant was required to have "actively participated in a program of support" (s 94(2)(aa) of the Act) following changes to the legislation – whether the primary judge erred in failing to consider questions of law – whether the primary judge erred in the construction of ss 94(1)(c)(i) and 94(2)(aa) of the Act COSTS – whether appellant is liable for costs of unsuccessful appeal – whether the primary judge erred in ordering appellant to pay costs of unsuccessful application Held: appeal dismissed
Legislation: Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (Cth) Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) Social Security (Requirements and Guidelines - Active Participation for Disability Support Pension) Determination 2011 Social Security Act 1991 (Cth)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate