Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Biasin v State of Victoria [2017] FCA 161 File number: VID 92 of 2016
Judge: KENNY J
Date of judgment: 27 February 2017
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application by litigation representative for approval of settlement – whether settlement in best interests of applicant
Legislation: Australian Human Rights Commission Act 1985 (Cth) Disability Discrimination Act 1992 (Cth) Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) Guardianship and Administration Act 1986 (Vic)
Cases cited: A on behalf of B v State of New South Wales (Department of Education and Training) (No 2) [2013] FCA 551 Butler v Djerriwarrh Employment & Education Services Inc [2015] FCA 296 Button v CSL Limited [2014] FCA 601 Davies v State of South Australia [2015] FCA 428 Fisher v Marin [2008] NSWSC 1357 Koenders v State of Victoria (Department of Education and Training) [2016] FCA 842 Modra v State of Victoria (Department of Human Services Victoria & Department of Education and Early Childhood Development) [2013] FCA 1041 Moore v State of New South Wales [2014] FCA 477 Scandolera v State of Victoria [2015] FCA 1451; 331 ALR 525 Smith v Marriott Support Services [2013] FCA 312 Wade v State of Victoria (No 2) [2012] FCA 1080
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate