Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Lamond [2017] FCA 180 File number: SAD 333 of 2016
Judge: BESANKO J
Date of judgment: 28 February 2017
Date of publication of reasons: 1 March 2017
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Where application seeks orders in the nature of permanent mandatory injunctions – where not appropriate to make interlocutory order in circumstances where such an order would have the practical effect of a final order – whether order linking the injunction sought and future remuneration of Respondent should be made – whether balance of convenience favours granting of injunction – whether evidence supports finding a breach of s 1324 of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) – whether Applicant has established a case for final relief
Legislation: Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) s 1324 Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) rr 7, 7.01
Date of hearing: 31 January 2017
Registry: South Australia
Division: General Division
National Practice Area: Commercial and Corporations
Sub-area: Corporations and Corporate Insolvency
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate