Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
AZT15 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2017] FCA 191 Appeal from: AZT15 v Minister for Immigration & Anor [2016] FCCA 1786
File number(s): VID 853 of 2016
Judge(s): SIOPIS J
Date of judgment: 3 March 2017
Catchwords: MIGRATION – protection visa application – appellant convicted of sexual offences against his ex-de facto partner and step-daughter – cancellation of permanent residency visa under s 501 and s 501A of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) – appellant feared he would suffer harm if he returned to Malta on the grounds that he was a sex offender – member of a particular social group – country information – whether Refugee Review Tribunal fell into jurisdictional error. PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – appellant in immigration detention – application for interlocutory injunction precluding the Minister for Immigration and Border Protection from transferring the appellant to the Christmas Island immigration detention centre.
Legislation: Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 195A, 256, 501(2), 501A(2)
Cases cited: NAFC v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs (2002) 126 FCR 99 Australian Broadcasting Corporation v Lenah Game Meats Pty Limited (2001) 208 CLR 199 SZTYO v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (2015) 231 FCR 376 SBEG v Secretary, Department of Immigration and Citizenship (No 2) (2012) 292 ALR 29 NAHI v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2004] FCAFC 10 Applicant WAEE v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCAFC 184 SZSSJ v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (No 2) (2015) 234 FCR 1 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v SZSSJ (2016) 334 ALR 653
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate