Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Frigger v Banning (No 3) [2017] FCA 221 File number: WAD 607 of 2015
Judge: BARKER J
Date of judgment: 8 March 2017
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – interlocutory application to amend originating application and statement of claim – whether pleas embarrassing – whether pleas obscure real questions of controversy, are ambiguous or not reasonably intelligible – whether current proceeding used to place in issue matters litigated in separate proceedings – abuse of process – application dismissed PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – interlocutory application to restrain practitioners from acting for respondents – where applicants allege legal practitioners acted "in combination" – whether applicants using current proceedings used to attack orders made in separate proceedings – abuse of process – application dismissed
Legislation: Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) ss 445D, 447A, 447A(4)(f), 447B, 471A, 477, 477(6), 553C, 1324, Part 5.3A Div 10-12 Personal Properties Securities Act 2009 (Cth) s 19, s 20 Civil Liabilities Act 2002 (WA) Supreme Court Rules 1971 (WA) O 66 r 59 Statutes of Set-Off (UK)
Cases cited: Australasian Memory Pty Ltd v Brien (2000) 200 CLR 270; [2000] HCA 30 Banning Holdings Pty Ltd v Holbrook [2009] WASC 178 Broken Hill Proprietary Co Ltd v Bell Resources Ltd (1984) 8 ACLR 609; (1984) 2 ACLC 157 Commonwealth of Australia v Rocklea Spinning Mills Pty Ltd [2005] FCA 902 Computer Accounting & Tax Pty Ltd (in liq) v Professional Services of Australia Pty Ltd [No 8] [2015] WASC 166 Computer Accounting & Tax Pty Ltd (in liq) v Professional Services of Australia Pty Ltd [No 9] [2015] WASC 343 Computer Accounting & Tax Pty Ltd v Professional Services of Australia Pty Ltd [2008] WASC 133 Computer Accounting & Tax Pty Ltd v Professional Services of Australia Pty Ltd [2008] WASC 133(S) Computer Accounting & Tax Pty Ltd v Professional Services of Australia (No 7) [2014] WASC 360 Computer Accounting & Tax Pty Ltd v Professional Services of Australia Pty Ltd [No 3] [2010] WASC 2 Computer Accounting & Tax Pty Ltd v Professional Services of Australia Pty Ltd [2010] WASC 2(S) Computer Accounting & Tax Pty Ltd v Professional Services of Australia Pty Ltd [No 4] [2011] WASC 284 EC Dawson Investments Pty Ltd v Crystal Finance Pty Ltd (No 3) [2013] WASC 183 Flynn v Theobald [2008] WASC 263 Frigger v Campbell-Smith [2010] WASC 353 Frigger v Clavey Legal Pty Ltd [No 3] [2015] WADC 21 Frigger v Lean [2012] WASC 66 Frigger v Professional Services of Australia Pty Ltd [No 3] [2014] WASCA 69 Hart-Roach v Public Trustee unrep. WASC lib. no. 980044 Hazcor Pty Ltd & Ors v Kirwanon Pty Ltd Lib No. 950074b Holbrook v Professional Services Pty Ltd [2012] WASC 444 Idoport v National Australia Bank Ltd [2006] NSWCA 202 Jeffery & Katauskas Pty Ltd v SST Consulting Pty Ltd (2009) 239 CLR 75; [2009] HCA 43 Kidd v Artus t/as Downings Legal [2013] WASC 264 Kitay, in the matter of Computer Accounting & Tax Pty Ltd (in liq) [2016] FCA 720 Medibank Private Ltd v Cassidy [2002] FCAFC 290 Professional Services of Australia Pty Ltd (Administrator Appointed) v Computer Accounting & Tax Pty Ltd [No 3] [2010] WASC 93 Professional Services of Australia Pty Ltd v Computer Accounting & Tax Pty Ltd [No 2] [2009] WASCA 183 Professional Services of Australia Pty Ltd v Computer Accounting & Tax Pty Ltd [No 2] [2009] WASCA 183(S) Professional Services of Australia Pty Ltd v Computer Accounting & Tax Pty Ltd [No 4] [2015] WASCA 253 Professional Services of Australia Pty Ltd v Computer Accounting & Tax Pty Ltd [2010] WASC 38 Re Ansett [No 1] [2001] FCA 1806 Re New Tel Ltd (in liq) [2004] FCA 1154 Re Sons of Gwalia Ltd; ex parte Love [2008] WASC 75 Selangor United Rubber Estates Ltd v Cradock [1965] Ch 896 Sheraz Pty Ltd v Vegas Enterprises Pty Ltd [2015] WASCA 4 Smolarek v Liwszyc [2006] WASCA 50
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate