Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Chaste Corporation Pty Ltd (No 8) [2017] FCA 233 File number: QUD 252 of 2001
Judge: LOGAN J
Date of judgment: 8 March 2017
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – reasons for judgment originally published in redacted form because of public interest in maintaining confidentiality of informer and integrity of pending criminal investigation – application by informer for listing of restriction on publication – absence of continued public interest in non-publication Held: restriction on publication lifted. Judgment published in unredacted form.
Cases cited: Australian Competition & Consumer Commission v Chaste Corporation Pty Ltd (No 6) (2013) 223 FCR 426 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Chaste Corporation Pty Ltd (No 7) (2015) 235 FCR 563
Date of hearing: 8 March 2017 – Heard on the papers in chambers
Registry: Queensland
Division: General Division
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 14
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate