Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
DZAEK v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2017] FCA 247 Appeal from: DZAEK & Ors v Minister for Immigration & Anor [2016] FCCA 1824
File number: NTD 36 of 2016
Judge: PERRY J
Date of judgment: 14 March 2017
Catchwords: MIGRATION – whether Tribunal failed to consider child's speech impediment in assessing reasonableness of relocation - whether Tribunal failed to consider claim to fear persecution by reason of membership of a particular social group, being girls who attend or have attended a western school- appeal dismissed
Legislation: Migration Act 1958 (Cth) Federal Court Rules (Cth) r 9.61
Cases cited: Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Yusuf [2001] HCA 30 Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Rajalingam (1999) 93 FCR 220 Re Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs; ex parte Applicant S20/2002 [2003] HCA 30 M211 of 2003 v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2004] FCA 660 Gupta v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2016] FCA 1004 SZFDE v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2007] HCA 35 Dranichnikov v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2003] HCA 26 DZAEK & Ors v Minister for Immigration & Anor [2016] FCCA 1824 NAVK v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2004] FCA 1695 NAVK v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2005] FCAFC 124 NAHI v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2004] FCAFC 10 VQAB v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2014] FCAFC 104
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate