Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BGP16 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2017] FCA 261 Appeal from: BGP16 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (No 2) FCCA 2660
File number: NSD 1839 of 2016
Judge: RARES J
Date of judgment: 16 February 2017
Legislation: Migration Act 1958 (Cth) s 36 Federal Circuit Court Rules 2001 r 13.03C
Cases cited: Re Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs; Ex parte Durairajasingham (2000) 168 ALR 407
Date of hearing: 16 February 2017
Registry: New South Wales
Division: General Division
National Practice Area: Administrative and Constitutional Law and Human Rights
Category: No Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 40
Counsel for the Appellant: The Appellant appeared in person
Solicitor for the First Respondent: Mr K Eskerie of Sparke Helmore
Counsel for the Second Respondent: The Second Respondent filed a submitting notice
ORDERS NSD 1839 of 2016
BETWEEN: BGP16 Appellant
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND BORDER PROTECTION First Respondent
ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS TRIBUNAL Second Respondent
JUDGE: RARES J DATE OF ORDER: 16 FEBRUARY 2017
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The appeal be dismissed. 2. The appellant pay the first respondent's costs. Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
(REVISED FROM THE TRANSCRIPT) RARES J: 1 This is an appeal from the decision of the Federal Circuit Court dismissing the appellant's application for Constitutional writ relief in respect of the decision of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal given on 3 May 2016 to affirm the Minister's delegate's decision not to grant the appellant a protection visa: BGP16 v Minister for Immigration (No 2) [2016] FCCA 2660.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate