Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Dincel Construction System Pty Limited v AFS Systems Pty Ltd [2017] FCA 262 File number: NSD 169 of 2017
Judge: NICHOLAS J
Date of judgment: 17 March 2017
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – alleged patent infringement – whether interlocutory injunction should be granted in favour of exclusive licensee – whether applicant has established prima facie case for final relief – whether balance of convenience favours grant of interlocutory relief PATENTS – claim construction – whether applicant established prima facie entitlement to final relief for infringement of a claim to a building element that includes "ramp surfaces" Held: Interlocutory injunction granted
Cases cited: Australian Broadcasting Corp v O'Neill (2006) 227 CLR 57 Jupiters Ltd v Neurizon Pty Ltd (2005) 65 IPR 86 Lockwood Security Products Pty Ltd v Doric Products Pty Ltd (2004) 217 CLR 274 Samsung Electronics Company Ltd v Apple Inc (2011) 217 FCR 238 Warner-Lambert Co LLC v Apotex Pty Ltd (2014) 106 IPR 218
Date of hearing: 14 March 2017
Registry: New South Wales
Division: General Division
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate