Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
ARJ17 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2017] FCA 263 File number: NSD 223 of 2017
Judge: RARES J
Date of judgment: 17 March 2017
Catchwords: HIGH COURT AND FEDERAL COURT – challenge to jurisdiction – whether Federal Court has original jurisdiction to hear challenge to non-privative clause decision as defined in s 474(6) of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) where decision alleged to involve jurisdictional error – whether such decision is "migration decision" in original jurisdiction of Federal Circuit Court under s 476(1) and excluded from Federal Court jurisdiction by s 476A(1) – original jurisdiction of Federal Court under s 39B(1) and (1A)(c) of the Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth) and s 19(1) of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) – whether s 476A of the Migration Act excludes Federal Court's original jurisdiction in respect of matter seeking relief in relation to a "migration decision" alleged to involve jurisdictional error – whether jurisdictional fact must be capable of ascertainment before final hearing STATUTORY INTERPRETATION – Migration Act 1958 (Cth) – meaning of "decision" within s 474 – whether textual construction of "decision" differs within s 474(2) as well as with s 474(4) – whether "decision" in s 474(4) means decision made under the Act as construed in Plaintiff S157/2002 v Commonwealth (2003) 211 CLR 476 – use of extrinsic materials in statutory construction
Legislation: Constitution ss 75, 76 Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (Cth) Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1977 (Cth) s 5, Sch 1 Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) Pt IVA, ss 19, 32AB Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth) s 39B Migration Act 1958 (Cth) Div 13A Pt 2, Pts 5, 7, Div 1 Pt 8, Div 2 Pt 8, Pt 8A, ss 5, 5E, 252, 261A, 261F, 261K, 273, 338, 411, 474, 474A, 475, 476, 476A, 476B, 477, 477A, 478, 479, 480, 484, 486A, 486AA Migration Legislation Amendment (Judicial Review) Act 2001 (Cth) Migration Litigation Reform Bill 2005 (Cth)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate