Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Frucor Beverages Limited v The Coca-Cola Company [2017] FCA 298 Appeal from: The Coca-Cola Company v Frucor Beverages Limited [2016] ATMO 38
File number: NSD 1112 of 2016
Judge: YATES J
Date of judgment: 24 March 2017
Catchwords: TRADE MARKS – application for advance rulings on the admissibility of evidence under s 192A(a) of the Evidence Act 1995 (Cth)
Legislation: Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) s 192A(a), s 55(1), s 56, s 57(1), s 135 Intellectual Property Laws Amendment (Raising the Bar) Act 2012 (Cth) Trade Marks Act 1995 (Cth) s 41(6)(a)
Cases cited: Apple Inc v Registrar of Trade Marks (2014) 227 FCR 511; [2014] FCA 1304 Blount Inc v Registrar of Trade Marks (1998) 83 FCR 50; [1998] FCA 440 Chocolaterie Guylian NV v Registrar of Trade Marks (2009) 180 FCR 60; [2009] FCA 891 Optical 88 Ltd v Optical 88 Pty Ltd (No 2) (2010) 275 ALR 526; [2010] FCA 1380 Societe Des Produits Nestle SA v Unilever plc [2003] RPC 35 Woolworths Ltd v BP plc (No 2) (2006) 154 FCR 97; [2006] FCAFC 132
Date of hearing: 2 March 2017
Registry: New South Wales
Division: General Division
National Practice Area: Intellectual Property
Sub-area: Trade Marks
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 33
Counsel for the Appellant: Mr M Darke SC with Ms C Bembrick
Solicitor for the Appellant: Clayton Utz
Counsel for the Respondent: Ms C Amato
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate