Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia v Mainteck Pty Ltd [2017] FCA 301 File number: QUD 891 of 2016
Judge: RANGIAH J
Date of judgment: 8 March 2017
Catchwords: INDUSTRIAL LAW – preliminary discovery against prospective respondent – whether prospective applicant reasonably believes it may have a right to obtain relief from the Court – whether reasonable inquiries have been made – whether prospective applicant reasonably believes the prospective respondent has or is likely to have relevant documents – application allowed in part
Legislation: Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) s 50 Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) rr 7.23, 7.23(1)(a), 7.23(1)(b) and 7.23(1)(c)(ii)
Cases cited: EBOS Group Proprietary Limited v Team Medical Supplies Proprietary Limited (2012) 199 FCR 533 Reeve v Aqualast Proprietary Limited [2012] FCA 679
Date of hearing: 8 March 2017
Registry: Queensland
Division: General Division
National Practice Area: Employment & Industrial Relations
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 18
Counsel for the Prospective Applicant: Mr CA Massy
Solicitor for the Prospective Applicant: Hall Payne Lawyers
Counsel for the Prospective Respondent: Mr B Cross
Solicitor for the Prospective Respondent: Mackinnon Finch Solicitors
ORDERS QUD 891 of 2016
BETWEEN: COMMUNICATIONS, ELECTRICAL, ELECTRONIC, ENERGY, INFORMATION, POSTAL, PLUMBING AND ALLIED SERVICES UNION OF AUSTRALIA Prospective Applicant
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate