Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Singh v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2017] FCA 304 Appeal from: Singh v Minister for Immigration & Anor [2016] FCCA 2944
File number: VID 1289 of 2016
Judge: MOSHINSKY J
Date of judgment: 24 March 2017
Catchwords: MIGRATION – skilled visa – where Tribunal found that appellant did not meet public interest criteria – whether jurisdictional error by Tribunal – jurisdictional error not established
Legislation: Migration Act 1958 (Cth), s 5(1) Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth), Sch 2, cl 885.224
Date of hearing: 20 March 2017
Registry: Victoria
Division: General Division
National Practice Area: Administrative and Constitutional Law and Human Rights
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 20
Counsel for the Appellant: The appellant appeared in person
Counsel for the First Respondent: Mr L Brown
Solicitor for the First Respondent: Clayton Utz
Counsel for the Second Respondent: The second respondent filed a submitting notice, save as to costs
ORDERS VID 1289 of 2016
BETWEEN: BIKRAMJIT SINGH Appellant
AND: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND BORDER PROTECTION First Respondent
ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS TRIBUNAL Second Respondent
JUDGE: MOSHINSKY J DATE OF ORDER: 24 MARCH 2017
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The appeal be dismissed. 2. The appellant pay the first respondent's costs of the proceeding, to be taxed if not agreed. Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate