Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
SZVCP v Cho [2017] FCA 310 File numbers: NSD 1944 of 2016 NSD 1995 of 2016 NSD 2056 of 2016
Judge: MARKOVIC J
Date of judgment: 28 March 2017
Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – application for review of decisions made by Registrars of the Federal Court of Australia – where Registrars refused to accept documents for filing pursuant to r 2.26 of the Federal Court Rules – whether Registrars' decisions were beyond power or an abuse of power – whether Registrars complied with the rules of natural justice – whether Registrars' decisions were legally unreasonable – standard of legal unreasonableness under s 5(2)(g) of the Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act – whether Registrars took into account irrelevant considerations
Legislation: Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1977 ss 5(1)(a), 5(1)(c), 5(1)(e), 5(2)(a), 5(2)(g), 5(2)(j) Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) rr 2.26
Cases cited: BMF16 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2016] FCA 1530 CKI Utilities Development Pty Ltd v Australian Energy Regulator [2016] FCA 17 East Australian Pipeline Pty Ltd v ACCC (2007) 233 CLR 229 Emmett v McCormack [2015] FCA 826 Kioa v West (1985) 159 CLR 550 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v Stretton [2016] FCAFC 11 Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v Li (2013) 249 CLR 332 Paramasivam v Randwick City Council [2005] FCA 369 Satchithanantham v National Australia Bank Limited [2009] FCA 1171 Shaw v Buljan [2016] FCA 829
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate