Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
CaesarStone Sdot-Yam Ltd v Ceramiche Caesar S.p.A. [2017] FCA 326 File numbers: NSD 166 of 2015 NSD 1187 of 2015 NSD 1719 of 2015
Judge: ROBERTSON J
Date of judgment: 28 March 2017
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – late service of three affidavits – interlocutory application for leave to rely on those affidavits – whether those affidavits of limited probative value – whether explanation for the delay – whether prejudice to other party
Legislation: Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 37M Trade Marks Act 1995 (Cth) ss 56, 88
Date of hearing: 28 March 2017
Registry: New South Wales
Division: General Division
National Practice Area: Intellectual Property
Sub-area: Trade Marks
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 16
Counsel for CaesarStone Sdot-Yam Ltd: Mr T Cordiner SC with Ms R White
Solicitor for CaesarStone Sdot-Yam Ltd: K&L Gates
Counsel for the Ceramiche Caesar S.p.A.: Mr C Burgess with Ms E Whitby
Solicitor for Ceramiche Caesar S.p.A.: Spruson & Ferguson
ORDERS NSD 166 of 2015
BETWEEN: CAESARSTONE SDOT-YAM LTD Applicant
AND: CERAMICHE CAESAR S.p.A. Respondent
NSD 1187 of 2015
BETWEEN: CAESARSTONE SDOT-YAM LTD Applicant
AND: CERAMICHE CAESAR S.p.A. Respondent
NSD 1719 of 2015
BETWEEN: CERAMICHE CAESAR S.p.A Applicant
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate