Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Ringshaug v Comcare (No 2) [2017] FCA 349 File number: ACD 19 of 2016
Judge: BROMWICH J
Date of judgment: 4 April 2017
Catchwords: COSTS – application for costs following success in proceedings – application for costs in part on party and party basis – application for costs in part on indemnity basis – where offer to compromise and Calderbank offer made – principles of indemnity costs – held: costs awarded on party and party basis and indemnity basis to successful party in proceedings
Legislation: Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth), rr 1.35, 25.14
Cases cited: Calderbank v Calderbank [1975] 3 All ER 333 Comcare v Martin [2016] HCA 43; (2016) 339 ALR 1 Comcare v Martin [2016] HCATrans 116 Dye v Commonwealth Securities Limited (No 2) [2012] FCA 407 Martin v Comcare [2015] FCAFC 169; (2015) 238 FCR 373 Ringshaug v Comcare [2017] FCA 48 Sydney Equine Coaches Pty Ltd v Gorst [2017] FCAFC 34
Date of hearing: 21 September 2016
Registry: Australian Capital Territory
Division: General Division
National Practice Area: Administrative and Constitutional Law and Human Rights
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 24
Counsel for the Applicant: Mr M A Robinson SC with Mr A Anforth
Solicitor for the Applicant: Capital Lawyers Pty Ltd
Counsel for the Respondent: Mr P G Woulfe
Solicitor for the Respondent: Comcare
ORDERS ACD 19 of 2016
BETWEEN: SUE RINGSHAUG Applicant
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate