Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Tisdell v Secretary, Department of Social Services [2017] FCA 351 Appeal from: Mark Tisdell and Secretary, Department of Social Services [2016] AATA 762
File number: NSD 1889 of 2016
Judge: ROBERTSON J
Date of judgment: 11 April 2017
Catchwords: SOCIAL SECURITY – appeal on a question of law from decision of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal (Tribunal) – disability support pension – whether the applicant's impairment was of 20 points or more under the Impairment Tables in the Social Security (Tables for the Assessment of Work-related Impairment for Disability Support Pension) Determination 2011 (Cth) – whether conditions causing the impairment were permanent – whether applicant's condition of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) permanent – whether the condition of PTSD fully treated – whether the condition of PTSD fully stabilised – whether applicant had undertaken reasonable treatment for the condition of PTSD – whether applicant's condition of depression permanent – whether the condition of depression fully treated – whether the condition of depression fully stabilised – whether applicant had undertaken reasonable treatment for the condition of depression – whether errors of law on the part of the Tribunal – whether decision of Tribunal legally unreasonable
Legislation: Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (Cth) s 44 Social Security Act 1991 (Cth) ss 23, 26, 94 Social Security (Tables for the Assessment of Work-related Impairment for Disability Support Pension) Determination 2011 (Cth) ss 3, 6, 7
Cases cited: Haritos v Commissioner of Taxation [2015] FCAFC 92; 233 FCR 315
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate