Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Burragubba on behalf of the Wangan and Jagalingou People v State of Queensland [2017] FCA 373 File number: QUD 85 of 2004
Judge: REEVES J
Date of judgment: 11 April 2017
Catchwords: NATIVE TITLE – application under s 66B Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) to replace members of the authorised applicant – whether authorisation meeting was validly convened and conducted under s 251B Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) – whether proper notice of authorisation meeting was given – discretion under s 66B(2) to replace authorised applicant
Legislation: Native Title Act 1993 (Cth)
Cases cited: Bolton on behalf of the Southern Noongar Families v State of Western Australia [2004] FCA 760 Butterworth on behalf of the Wiri Core Country Claim v State of Queensland (No 2) [2014] FCA 590 Daniel v Western Australia (2002) 194 ALR 278; [2002] FCA 1147 Frank on behalf of the Mayala People v State of Western Australia (No 3) [2016] FCA 1255 Jurruru People v State of Western Australia [2012] FCA 2 Landers v State of South Australia (2003) 128 FCR 495; [2003] FCA 264 Lawson on behalf of the 'Pooncarie' Barkandji (Paakantyi) People v Minister for Land and Water Conservation for the State of New South Wales [2002] FCA 1517 TJ v Western Australia (2015) 242 FCR 283; [2015] FCA 818 Ward v Northern Territory [2002] FCA 171 Weribone on behalf of the Mandandanji People v State of Queensland [2013] FCA 255
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate