Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Generate Group Pty Ltd v Sea-Tech Automation Pty Ltd [2017] FCA 377 File number(s): NSD 1701 of 2015
Judge(s): JAGOT J
Date of judgment: 13 April 2017
Catchwords: PRIVILEGE – privilege against self-incrimination – whether items produced were in the control of the first respondent when produced under a notice to produce to the first respondent – whether the production of items was in error – whether notice to produce and orders for access should be set aside – application dismissed
Legislation: Criminal Code Act 1995 (Cth) Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) Crimes Act 1900 (NSW)
Cases cited: Eizenberg v Eizenberg [2008] VSC 322 Environment Protection Authority v Caltex Refining Co Pty Ltd (1993) 178 CLR 477 Hepburn v Teplitzky [2010] FCA 801 Johnston Fear &Kingham v Commonwealth (1943) 67 CLR 314 Pioneer Mortgage Services Pty Ltd v Columbus Capital Pty Ltd [2016] FCAFC 78 Reid v Howard (1995) 184 CLR 1 Rochfort v Trade Practices Commission (1982) 153 CLR 134 R v Ronen [2004] NSWCCA 67; (2004) 62 NSWLR 707
Date of hearing: 24 March 2017
Registry: New South Wales
Division: General Division
National Practice Area: Intellectual Property
Sub-area: Copyright and Industrial Designs
Category: Catchwords
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate