Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Leroy v Koutavas, in the matter of Koutavas [2017] FCA 381 File number: NSD 42 of 2017
Judge: ROBERTSON J
Date of judgment: 12 April 2017
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – deceased person who was interested in, or the estate of deceased person which is interested in, a question in the proceeding – deceased person has no personal representative – whether proceeding should be continued in the absence of a person representing the deceased person
Legislation: Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) r 9.24
Cases cited: Borough of Drummoyne v Hogarth (1906) 23 WN (NSW) 243 Porters v Cessnock City Council [2005] NSWSC 1275; 12 BPR 23, 209 Steinecke v Wayne [2011] NSWSC 428
Date of hearing: 12 April 2017
Registry: New South Wales
Division: General Division
National Practice Area: Commercial and Corporations
Sub-area: General and Personal Insolvency
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 19
Counsel for the Applicant: Mr RD Marshall SC
Solicitor for the Applicant: Bartier Perry
Counsel for the Respondents: The Respondents did not appear
ORDERS NSD 42 of 2017 IN THE MATTER OF HARRY KOUTAVAS BETWEEN: PAUL LEROY Applicant
AND: KANELLA KOUTAVAS First Respondent
ELIAS FILDISSIS Second Respondent
DIMITRA FILDISSIS Third Respondent
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate