Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Walker v Military Rehabilitation and Compensation Commission [2017] FCA 386 File number: QUD 48 of 2017
Judge: LOGAN J
Date of judgment: 10 April 2017
Catchwords: DEFENCE AND WAR – veterans – entitlements ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – review of decision of Administrative Appeals Tribunal – whether grounds of appeal state of question of law – allegedly forged documents – whether the Tribunal failed to take into account a relevant consideration – refusal to issue summons in interlocutory proceeding – no denial of procedural fairness – appeal dismissed
Legislation: Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (Cth) ss 2A, 25, 29, 33, 43, 44 Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth) s 39B
Cases cited: Drake v Minister for Immigration & Ethnic Affairs (1979) 46 FLR 409 Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v SZIAI [2009] 83 ALJR 1123 Rana v Repatriation Commission (2011) 196 FCR 137 Sun v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (2016) 243 FCR 220
Date of hearing: 10 April 2017
Registry: Queensland
Division: General Division
National Practice Area: Administrative and Constitutional Law and Human Rights
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 30
Counsel for the Applicant: The Applicant appeared in person
Counsel for the Respondent: Mr C Clark
Solicitor for the Respondent: Sparke Helmore
ORDERS QUD 48 of 2017
BETWEEN: KELL WALKER Applicant
AND: MILITARY REHABILITATION AND COMPENSATION COMMISSION Respondent
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate