Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
United Voice v Phillip Cleaning Service Pty Ltd [2017] FCA 392 File number(s): ACD 132 of 2015
Judge(s): JAGOT J
Date of judgment: 21 April 2017
Catchwords: INDUSTRIAL LAW – whether employer complied with legal obligations to employees – whether employees underpaid – whether employer misrepresented employee workplace rights – whether required induction provided – whether payslips complied with regulations
Legislation: Cleaning Services Industry Award 2010 Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) ss 50, 323, 345, 536, 550 Fair Work Regulations 2009 (Cth) r 3.46 Phillip Cleaning Services and LHMU Clean Start Union Collective Agreement 2010 for ACT Government Schools
Cases cited: Harbour City Real Estate Pty Ltd t/as Re/Max Harbour City Real Estate (ACN 111 210 023) v Cargill (No 3) [2009] FCA 669; (2009) 186 IR 260
Date of hearing: 14, 15, 16 March 2017
Registry: New South Wales
Division: Fair Work Division
National Practice Area: Employment & Industrial Relations
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 54
Counsel for the Applicants: Mr O Fagir
Solicitor for the Applicants: Mr S Uren of United Voice, appeared on behalf of the Applicants
Counsel for the Respondents: Mr D Allen
Solicitor for the Respondents: Kekatos Lawyers
ORDERS ACD 132 of 2015
BETWEEN: UNITED VOICE First Applicant
NEEKA MWEE Second Applicant
EH HTOO GYI (and others named in the Schedule) Third Applicant
AND: PHILLIP CLEANING SERVICES PTY LTD First Respondent
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate