Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Kassiou v Heard (Liquidator) [2017] FCA 425 Appeal from: Application for leave to appeal: Heard, in the matter of GEBIE Services Pty Ltd (in liq) [2017] FCA 323
File number: SAD 80 of 2017
Judge: CHARLESWORTH J
Date of judgment: 28 April 2017
Catchwords: APPEAL AND NEW TRIAL – whether judgment appealed against is interlocutory – whether leave to appeal is required CORPORATIONS – examination summons issued under Pt 5.9 of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) — whether scope of examination and related orders for production of documents are arguably too wide PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – whether application for leave to appeal, and antecedent question of whether leave to appeal is required, should be referred to a Full Court for hearing and determination
Legislation: Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth), s 81 Companies Act 1961 (NSW), s 249 Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), ss 9, 53, 596A, 596B, 596D, 596F, 597, Pt 5.9 Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth), ss 24, 25, 35A, 37M Federal Court (Corporations) Rules 2000, rr 11.1, 11.5, 16.1
Cases cited: Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Edensor Nominees Pty Ltd (2000) 204 CLR 559 Australian Securities Commission v Marlborough Gold Mines Ltd (1993) 177 CLR 485 Carr v Finance Corporation of Australia Ltd (No 1) (1981) 147 CLR 246 Contura Mining Pty Ltd, in the matter of B.J. Jarrad Pty Ltd (in liq) v Mableson [2015] FCA 1362 Cubillo v Commonwealth (2001) 112 FCR 455 Décor Corporation Pty Ltd v Dart Industries Inc (1991) 33 FCR 397 Evans v Wainter Pty Ltd (2005) 145 FCR 176 Fencott v Muller (1983) 152 CLR 570 Gerah Imports Pty Ltd v The Duke Group Pty Ltd (in liquidation) (1993) 61 SASR 557 Grosvenor Hill (Qld) Pty Ltd v Barber (1994) 48 FCR 301 House v The King (1936) 55 CLR 499 Johnson Tiles Pty Ltd v Esso Australia Pty Ltd (2000) 104 FCR 564 Mazukov v University of Tasmania [2004] FCAFC 159 Meteyard v Love (2005) 65 NSWLR 36 O'Neill v Piscopo [2011] FCA 773 Re Banksia Securities Ltd [2013] VSC 416, (2013) 278 FLR 421 Re BPTC Ltd (in liq) (No 3) (1993) 29 NSWLR 708 Samsung Electronics Co Limited v Apple Inc [2013] FCAFC 138 Shapowloff v Stirling Henry Ltd (in Liq) (1972) 2 NSWLR 691 Trevor (Liquidator) v Evans [2017] FCAFC 36 Wati v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (1997) 78 FCR 543
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate