Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Telstra Corporation Limited v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (No 2) [2017] FCA 430 File number: NSD 1338 of 2015
Judge: FOSTER J
Date of judgment: 27 April 2017
Catchwords: COSTS – whether an applicant for judicial review of a regulatory decision, having failed to obtain any relief by way of judicial review, should pay the costs of certain entities who were added as parties to the proceeding upon their own application after the proceeding had been commenced in circumstances where those entities had taken a substantial role in the public inquiry which had led to the regulatory decision and where they had an obvious legitimate commercial interest in the outcome of the inquiry and of the judicial review proceeding
Cases cited: Telstra Corporation Limited v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission [2017] FCA 316 Credit Lyonnais Australia Ltd v Darling (1991) 5 ACSR 703 R v Australian Broadcasting Tribunal; Ex parte Hardiman (1980) 144 CLR 1 State of Victoria v Sportsbet Pty Ltd (No 2) [2012] FCAFC 174
Date of hearing: Decided on the papers
Registry: New South Wales
Division: General Division
National Practice Area: Commercial and Corporations
Sub-area: Economic Regulator, Competition and Access
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 20
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate