Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Clipsal Australia Pty Ltd v Clipso Electrical Pty Ltd (No 4) [2017] FCA 436 File number(s): NSD 2537 of 2013
Judge(s): PERRAM J
Date of judgment: 28 April 2017
Catchwords: COSTS – application for indemnity costs – consideration of applicable principles – whether lump sum costs order or ordinary taxation appropriate – whether costs should be made payable forthwith
Legislation: Acts Interpretation Act 1901 (Cth) ss 15AA, 15AC Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) ss 35A(1)(h), 59(4) Legislation Act 2003 (Cth) s 13(1)(a) Federal Court Rules 1979 (Cth) (repealed) Order 62 Rule 3(3) Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) rr 3.01(1)(b), 30.01(1), 40.02, 40.02(b), 40.13, Schedule 2 item 221
Cases cited: Clipsal Australia Pty Ltd v Clipso Electrical Pty Ltd (No.3) [2017] FCA 60 Clipsal Australia Pty Ltd v Clipso Electrical Pty Ltd [2016] FCA 37 Colgate-Palmolive Company v Cussons Pty Ltd [1993] FCA 801; (1993) 46 FCR 225 Cretazzo v Lombardi (1975) 13 SASR 4 Hughes v Western Australian Cricket Association (Inc) [1986] FCA 382; [1986] ATPR 40-736 Tenser v Quigley [2016] FCAFC 178
Date of hearing: Determined on the papers
Date of last submissions: 15 March 2017 (Applicants) The Respondents did not file written submissions
Registry: New South Wales
Division: General Division
National Practice Area: Intellectual Property
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate