Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Young v Hughes Trueman Pty Ltd (No 4) [2017] FCA 456 Appeal from: Application for extension of time: Young v Hughes Trueman Pty Ltd & Anor [2016] FCCA 989
File number: NSD 920 of 2016
Judge: LEE J
Date of judgment: 5 May 2017
Catchwords: COSTS – application for third party costs order against solicitors where an application for an extension of time to appeal orders made by the Federal Circuit Court was dismissed by another Judge of the Court - lack of reasonable basis for conspiracy allegation – award of indemnity costs EVIDENCE – General - admissibility of findings in previous judgment where respondents to costs application are non-parties – consideration of the application of s 91(1) of Evidence Act 1995 (Cth)
Legislation: Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth), s 58(3) Evidence Act 1995 (Cth), ss 91(1), 92, 93, 93(c), Pt 3.5 Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth), ss 43, 43(3)(f), Pt VB, 37N(4), 37M, 37N(2) Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth), r 36.05 Legal Profession Uniform Law Australian Solicitors' Conduct Rules 2015 (NSW), r 21.4
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate