Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Complete Windscreens (SA) Pty Ltd v Fair Work Ombudsman [2017] FCA 473 Appeal from: Application for leave to appeal: Fair Work Ombudsman v Complete Windscreens (SA) Pty Ltd (No 2) [2016] FCA 1563
File number: SAD 30 of 2017
Judge: CHARLESWORTH J
Date of judgment: 28 April 2017
Date of publication of reasons 9 May 2017
Legislation: Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) Workplace Relations Act 1996 (Cth) Federal Court Rules 2011, r 1.34, 4.01
Date of hearing: 28 April 2017
Registry: South Australia
Division: General Division
National Practice Area: Employment & Industrial Relations
Category: No catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 33
Counsel for the Appellant: Mr H Dean appeared on behalf of the Appellant
Counsel for the Respondent: Ms G Walker
Solicitor for the Respondent: Office of the Fair Work Ombudsman
ORDERS SAD 30 of 2017
BETWEEN: COMPLETE WINDSCREENS (SA) PTY LTD (ACN 090 479 324) Appellant
AND: FAIR WORK OMBUDSMAN Respondent
JUDGE: CHARLESWORTH J DATE OF ORDER: 28 APRIL 2017
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The appellant's application for leave to be represented on the appeal other than by a lawyer is dismissed. 2. The application filed on 3 April 2017 for orders staying the execution of orders of the learned primary judge be struck out. 3. The appellant is, on or before 19 May 2017, to engage legal representation in connection with the appeal and to file a notice of address for service. 4. Any application to amend the notice of appeal is to be filed and served on or before 9 June 2017. 5. Any application filed and served in accordance with the order in paragraph 4 is set down for hearing at 10:30am on 28 June 2017. 6. The appeal is set down for a case management hearing at 10:30am on 28 June 2017. 7. The parties have liberty to apply. 8. The respondent is, on or before 8 May 2017, to serve a copy of these orders and the reasons for judgment given on the appellant's application for leave to be represented by a non-lawyer on the proper officer of the appellant. 9. There be no order as to costs in respect of the two interlocutory applications filed on 3 April 2017. Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate